AG-2026.04-1426·hep-lat·cross-listed: gr-qchep-th
Impact of supersymmetry on the dynamical emergence of the spacetime in the type IIB matrix model with the Lorentz symmetry "gauge fixed"
Authors
- Konstantinos N. Anagnostopoulos
- Takehiro Azuma
- Mitsuaki Hirasawa
- Jun Nishimura
- Asato Tsuchiya
- Naoyuki Yamamori
Abstract
The type IIB matrix model has been proposed as a nonperturbative formulation of superstring theory. While numerical simulations of this model are essential for probing nonperturbative effects, such as the emergence of time and an expanding 3--dimensional space, they are hindered by the sign problem. We address this using the Complex Langevin Method (CLM). Furthermore, to suppress spurious numerical artifacts that originate from large Lorentz boosts due to the Lorentz symmetry of the model, we nonperturbatively fix the Lorentz symmetry using the Faddeev--Popov procedure. We then study this model to investigate the impact of supersymmetry on the dynamical generation of (3+1)--dimensional spacetime.
Submitted
28 April 20261 week ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.25564
Summary
Researchers use advanced numerical methods to simulate a matrix model proposed as a quantum gravity theory, finding how supersymmetry affects whether spacetime emerges dynamically from the mathematics.
- The type IIB matrix model is a candidate for describing quantum gravity without assuming spacetime exists beforehand—instead, spacetime emerges from the model's equations.
- The team overcame a major computational obstacle (the 'sign problem') using the Complex Langevin Method, a technique that lets them simulate systems where standard methods fail.
- By carefully handling the model's symmetries, they can now test whether supersymmetry—a hypothetical symmetry between matter and forces—is necessary for spacetime to emerge properly.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.