AG-2026.04-1477·hep-th·cross-listed: cond-mat.stat-mechmath-ph
Rethinking Dimensional Regularization in Critical Phenomena
Authors
- P. Beretta
- A. Codello
Abstract
We show that it is possible to use dimensional regularization (DR) beyond the usual $\varepsilon$-expansion in the context of renormalization group (RG) calculations in Critical Phenomena. Based on this fact, we propose a new functional RG scheme - Functional Dimensional Regularization (FDR) - and apply it to a scalar theory in three dimensions. We compute the critical exponents of the Ising universality class directly in $d=3$ under various typical approximations. The method that emerges combines the agility typical of DR with the generality proper of functional RG. Moreover, at a given order of approximation, FDR seems to provide faster convergence and better estimates than other functional RGs.
Submitted
28 April 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.25103
Summary
Physicists developed a new technique called Functional Dimensional Regularization that combines dimensional regularization with functional renormalization group methods to calculate critical exponents (like those for magnetic phase transitions) directly in three dimensions with improved accuracy.
- Dimensional regularization, a standard tool in particle physics, can be repurposed beyond its usual ε-expansion framework to tackle critical phenomena like the Ising model.
- The new Functional Dimensional Regularization scheme converges faster and gives more accurate predictions for critical exponents than existing functional RG methods at the same computational level.
- This bridges two powerful mathematical toolkits—dimensional regularization's elegance and functional RG's generality—creating a more efficient way to study phase transitions.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.