AG-2026.04-1482·math.DG·cross-listed: cs.LGhep-th
PINNs in More General Geometry
Authors
- Edward Hirst
Abstract
Neural architectures trained with losses inspired by differential conditions are the basis for PINN models. Since many constructions in differential geometry may be framed as minimisation of a differential functional, these functionals can be coded as loss functions to align the AI loss-minimisation goal with that of solving the geometric problem. This contribution to the Recent Progress in Computational String Geometry workshop proceedings introduces the PINN architecture defining principles, motivates how they are well suited for problems in differential geometry, and demonstrates their use via summaries of three works at this intersection.
Submitted
27 April 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.25020
Summary
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) can be adapted to solve differential geometry problems by encoding geometric optimization problems as neural network loss functions, bridging computational geometry with machine learning.
- PINNs work by training neural networks to minimize losses based on differential equations or geometric conditions, naturally aligning AI optimization with mathematical problem-solving.
- Differential geometry problems—like finding shapes that minimize certain geometric functionals—can be reformulated as loss functions that neural networks can learn to solve.
- This framework opens a new avenue for using deep learning on classical geometry problems, potentially offering computational advantages for complex shape optimization and geometric analysis.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.