AG-2026.04-1489·math-ph·cross-listed: cond-mat.str-elhep-thmath.KTquant-ph
The Classification of Pauli Stabilizer Codes: A Lattice and Continuum Treatise
Authors
- Bowen Yang
- Matthew Yu
Abstract
We classify mobile Pauli stabilizer codes up to gapped interfaces and coarse-graining using the framework of algebraic $\mathrm{L}$-theory. We compare this classification with that of framed TQFTs, theories that arise naturally in the continuum, highlighting a close structural relationship between the two. Our approach is formulated in the category of perfect chain complexes equipped with quadratic functor over the Laurent polynomial ring $R = \mathbb{Z}/p[x_1^{\pm 1}, \ldots, x_n^{\pm 1}]$, within which the collection of topological operators of Pauli stabilizer codes arise naturally as objects. In particular, we establish a bulk-boundary correspondence for lattice theories: the equivalence class of a Pauli stabilizer code up to gapped interface is described by a Clifford QCA in one dimension higher. This is done using the universal target category for stabilizer codes, which is the categorical spectrum whose existence and universal properties are introduced in this work. We conclude by highlighting subtle differences between the classification of Pauli stabilizer codes and TQFTs, leading to qualitative distinctions between lattice and continuum theories.
Submitted
27 April 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.24847
Summary
Researchers classify quantum error-correcting codes (Pauli stabilizer codes) using advanced algebra, showing they're equivalent to certain continuum theories and establishing a precise relationship between lattice and smooth versions of topological quantum field theory.
- The classification uses L-theory, a powerful algebraic tool, to organize stabilizer codes by their topological properties—much like how symmetry groups organize particle physics.
- A new 'bulk-boundary correspondence' shows that any stabilizer code's structure is encoded in a quantum cellular automaton in one higher dimension, creating a useful bridge between different descriptions.
- Lattice and continuum theories differ in subtle but important ways: stabilizer codes have more flexibility at interfaces than continuum TQFTs, revealing fundamental distinctions between discrete and smooth models.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.