AG-2026.04-1520·hep-ph·cross-listed: hep-ex
Muon $g$$-$$2$: correlation-induced uncertainties in precision data combinations
Authors
- Alexander Keshavarzi
- Daisuke Nomura
- Thomas Teubner
- Aidan Wright
Abstract
We present a general and systematic framework to quantify uncertainties arising from imperfectly known systematic correlations in data combinations. Formulated at the level of the combined data, the method enables controlled variation of the correlation structure, leading to the construction of covariance matrices directly on the resulting combination and thus providing a robust and systematic estimate of correlation-induced uncertainties. We apply the method to $e^+e^- \rightarrow \mathrm{hadrons}$ cross section data, with the resulting covariance matrices propagated to derived observables, including dispersive determinations of the hadronic vacuum polarization (HVP) contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment, $a_μ^\mathrm{HVP}$. We find that uncertainties from systematic correlation assumptions are generally subdominant but non-negligible, and do not fully account for differences between existing $e^+e^- \rightarrow \mathrm{hadrons}$ data combinations. The framework is broadly applicable to correlated data combinations in precision measurements and constitutes a new component of the upcoming KNTW data combination for $a_μ^\mathrm{HVP}$.
Submitted
27 April 20261 week ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.25004
Summary
A new method quantifies how unknown correlations between measurement errors affect combined datasets, applied to electron-positron collision data used to predict the muon's magnetic moment anomaly.
- Physicists combine multiple experiments to measure fundamental quantities, but they don't always know exactly how errors in different experiments are correlated—this work provides a systematic way to assess that hidden uncertainty.
- When applied to the muon g−2 puzzle (a famous discrepancy between theory and experiment), correlation uncertainties turn out to be small but real enough to matter for precision comparisons.
- The framework is flexible and can be reused for any precision measurement combining multiple correlated datasets, making it a useful tool for the next generation of high-precision physics.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.