AG-2026.04-158·gr-qc·cross-listed: hep-thmath-ph
Electromagnetic wave propagation in static black hole spacetimes: an effective refractive index description in Schwarzschild geometry
Authors
- Abdullah Guvendi
- Omar Mustafa Semra Gurtas Dogan
- Hassan Hassanabadi
Abstract
We present a fully covariant and gauge-invariant formulation of electromagnetic wave propagation in static, spherically symmetric black hole spacetimes, developed entirely within Schwarzschild-like coordinates. Start ing from the source-free Maxwell equations on a curved background, electromagnetic perturbations are de composed according to parity and systematically reduced to gauge-invariant dynamical variables without introducing auxiliary coordinate transformations or horizon-regular variables. Both axial and polar sectors are shown to obey the same parity-independent master equation, and their exact isospectrality emerges nat urally as a direct consequence of Maxwell theory in four dimensions. By eliminating first-derivative terms through an appropriate field redefinition, the radial dynamics is cast into a Helmholtz-type equation, which motivates the introduction of an effective, position- and frequency-dependent refractive index encoding grav itational redshift, curvature effects, and angular momentum within a unified optical framework. Specializing to the Schwarzschild geometry, we obtain the refractive index in closed analytical form and analyze its behavior in the near-horizon, intermediate, and asymptotic regimes. The resulting description provides a transparent and physically intuitive interpretation of electromagnetic evanescence, and propagation in black hole spacetimes, and establishes a robust foundation for wave-optical, semiclassical, and numerical studies in more general static gravitational backgrounds.
Submitted
7 April 20262 weeks ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.07371
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.