AG-2026.04-1599·quant-ph·cross-listed: gr-qcmath-ph
Galilean Reeh--Schlieder Obstruction
Authors
- Leonardo A. Pachon
Abstract
We prove that the standard Galilean Haag--Kastler axioms, augmented by Bargmann mass superselection, are inconsistent with the Reeh--Schlieder property: no such net admits a vacuum that is cyclic and separating for every local field algebra. Two ingredients combine: Galilean Schrödinger fields annihilate the Fock vacuum, and Bargmann mass superselection forbids the Hermitian-combination evasion that keeps relativistic axioms consistent. The result extends beyond the Fock-representation hypothesis: any Galilean Haag--Kastler net whose canonical fields carry definite Bargmann mass charges and admit time-zero restrictions on a field-algebra-stable common dense domain is incompatible with Reeh--Schlieder. The bounded-below mass spectrum and the vacuum-at-spectral-minimum, usually imposed as separate axioms, are derived consequences -- of positive-energy boost positivity and a Bose-CCR algebraic descent, respectively. The Tomita--Takesaki modular flow is consequently unavailable on Galilean local field algebras. We identify the Reeh--Schlieder property as the precise structural ingredient distinguishing relativistic from Galilean algebraic quantum field theory: relativistic AQFT has it as a theorem, Galilean AQFT cannot.
Submitted
29 April 20261 week ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.26271
Summary
A fundamental incompatibility exists between Galilean quantum mechanics (non-relativistic) and a key axiom of algebraic quantum field theory: the Reeh–Schlieder property cannot hold in Galilean theories with mass superselection rules.
- The Reeh–Schlieder property—which ensures the vacuum state can generate all physical states from local operations—is provably impossible in Galilean quantum field theories with mass conservation, unlike in relativistic theories where it holds automatically.
- The obstruction arises because Galilean fields annihilate the vacuum, and mass superselection prevents the mathematical workarounds that save relativistic theories—revealing a deep structural difference between the two frameworks.
- This result clarifies why relativistic and non-relativistic quantum field theories are fundamentally different: the Reeh–Schlieder property is not just a technical detail but the precise axiom that distinguishes them mathematically.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.