AG-2026.04-1602·hep-ph·cross-listed: astro-ph.COgr-qchep-th
Gravitational Properties of the Monopole Bag
Authors
- Yu Komiya
- Fumihiro Takayama
Abstract
Axionic cosmologies constitute a class of models with phenomenologically rich symmetry breaking in the early universe. In the case where monopoles are present in such a background, the axion profile may be deformed; it is possible to construct a ``monopole bag" state composed of a central monopole within a closed axion domain wall. We consider the gravitational properties of this hybrid defect, and find a both horizon-less and a black hole-like final state can result as remnants of the monopole-domain wall system after gravitational collapse for different input parameters. We demonstrate that the latter classifies as dyonic regular black hole, evading the usual singular gravitational collapse and retaining a non-trivial axionic profile through exotic electromagnetic properties of an axionic Chern-Simons term.
Submitted
29 April 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.26191
Summary
Physicists show that a hybrid defect made of a monopole wrapped in an axion domain wall can collapse into either a smooth, horizonless object or a special type of black hole that avoids the usual singularity.
- The 'monopole bag'—a magnetic monopole surrounded by a shell of axion field—is a theoretically stable hybrid defect in early-universe models with broken symmetries.
- Under gravitational collapse, this system can produce a 'dyonic regular black hole' that has no singularity at its center, thanks to unusual electromagnetic effects from the axion field itself.
- This result suggests a way that quantum gravity's singularity problem might be naturally resolved in axion-based cosmologies without requiring separate quantum corrections.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.