AG-2026.04-1615·hep-th
Scale-separated vacua with extended supersymmetry
Authors
- Niccolò Cribiori
- Fotis Farakos
- Alexandros Zarafonitis
Abstract
We propose the first examples of scale-separated vacua with extended supersymmetry. They arise as circle compactifications of four-dimensional vacua of massive type IIA supergravity with scale separation, upon introducing additional fluxes and sources. We provide both the ten-dimensional solutions and the three-dimensional effective descriptions in terms of Kähler potential and superpotential. The conformal dimensions of the putative dual two-dimensional field theory appear not to be integers. The superpotential for the additional fluxes of one of our models was guessed by ChatGPT and, to the best of our knowledge, it does not appear in existing literature. Should these vacua be solutions of string theory, they would allow to address the open problem of scale separation from the vantage point of extended supersymmetry.
Submitted
29 April 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.26755
Summary
Researchers construct the first examples of scale-separated vacua (solutions where gravity effects are much weaker than particle physics) while preserving extended supersymmetry, a key requirement for consistent string theory models.
- By compactifying 10-dimensional string theory on a circle and adding fluxes, the authors obtained vacua where the gravitational scale separates from the particle-physics scale—solving a long-standing consistency problem in string cosmology.
- The effective three-dimensional description reveals an unusual feature: the dual field theory appears to have non-integer scaling dimensions, suggesting these solutions may require new physics beyond standard conformal field theory.
- One superpotential in their model was discovered via ChatGPT and is new to the literature, highlighting how AI can assist in exploring the vast landscape of string solutions.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.