AG-2026.04-1629·hep-th·cross-listed: quant-ph
Quantum mechanical bootstrap without inequalities: SYK bilinear spectrum
Authors
- Kok Hong Thong
- David Vegh
Abstract
We study a quantum mechanical system whose spectrum coincides with that of bilinear operators of the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model. The standard positivity-based quantum mechanical bootstrap is degenerate with respect to the boundary data: it does not distinguish the boundary conditions that select the SYK spectrum, and hence is insufficient to determine the eigenvalues. Instead, by considering fractional powers of operators, we obtain constraint equations that determine the spectrum without imposing positivity. The resulting roots converge to exact eigenvalues as the truncation order increases. We call this the direct bootstrap.
Submitted
28 April 20262 weeks ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.26007
Summary
Researchers found a way to calculate the spectrum of a quantum system related to the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model by using fractional operator powers instead of traditional positivity constraints, which had failed to uniquely pin down the allowed energy levels.
- The standard quantum bootstrap—a powerful technique that uses positivity to constrain quantum spectra—turns out to be degenerate for this system, meaning it can't distinguish between different boundary conditions that produce different spectra.
- By considering fractional powers of operators (like the square root or cube root of a quantum operator), the authors derive constraint equations that don't rely on positivity but still determine the spectrum uniquely.
- This 'direct bootstrap' approach converges to exact eigenvalues as you include more terms, suggesting a new avenue for solving spectra in quantum mechanical systems where traditional methods get stuck.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.