AG-2026.04-163·hep-th·cross-listed: gr-qc
Geodesics from Quantum Field Theory: A Case Study in AdS
Authors
- Vaibhav Burman
- Chethan Krishnan
- Livesh Parajuli
Abstract
Localized one-particle states of a quantum field theory--whether in flat space or on a curved background--are expected to exhibit geodesic motion in an appropriate semiclassical regime. This expectation is often invoked heuristically: in this work we develop two precise implementations and test them in detail in global AdS$_3$. First, we define a covariant ''center-of-mass'' trajectory from the expectation value of the stress tensor operator and show, using only $\nabla_μ\langle T^{μν}\rangle=0$, that it obeys the geodesic equation in the monopole (sufficiently localized) approximation in a general spacetime. This provides a QFT-in-curved-spacetime generalization of the Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon framework in classical general relativity. Second, we construct position operators from the Klein--Gordon inner product and mode completeness, and compute their expectation values in generic single-particle wave packet states. We then build explicit normalizable wave packets of a free scalar field in empty AdS$_3$ with tunable energy and angular momentum, and demonstrate analytically and numerically that both prescriptions reproduce the expected radial, circular, and elliptical-like timelike and null geodesics. Our discussion also isolates a natural ultra-relativistic regime in which the wave packet trajectory exhibits a controlled crossover from timelike to null geodesic behavior. We identify precise limits where the localized geodesic interpretation of the wave packet breaks down. On the CFT side, we show that bulk localization--specifically the radial data--is captured by how the state is distributed over global descendants of the dual primary.
Submitted
7 April 20262 weeks ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.05901
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.