AG-2026.04-1650·hep-ph
Radiative charmonium decays in a contact-interaction model with dynamical quark anomalous magnetic moment
Authors
- Yehan Xu
- Zanbin Xing
- Khépani Raya
- Lei Chang
Abstract
The BESIII Collaboration has recently reported two measurements of the two-photon decay width of the $η_c$ meson. The 2024 result is significantly larger than most theoretical and empirical expectations, while a subsequent measurement published in early 2026 shows better agreement with the world average and conventional theoretical estimates. In this work, we study the $η_c\toγγ$ and $J/ψ\toγη_c$ processes within a contact interaction model that incorporates valence-quark anomalous magnetic moment effects, which are absent in standard treatments. Besides achieving agreement with modern lattice QCD estimates for these observables, we find that the 2024 central value for $η_c\toγγ$ lies above the range that could be accommodated by the present framework, whereas the 2026 result is naturally consistent with it.
Submitted
29 April 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.26185
Summary
A theoretical model incorporating quantum corrections to quark magnetism successfully explains recent measurements of how certain charm-quark mesons decay into photons, resolving tension between conflicting experimental results.
- The model includes 'anomalous magnetic moment' effects—subtle quantum corrections to how quarks interact with electromagnetic fields—that standard theories typically ignore.
- The 2024 BESIII measurement of η_c decay was anomalously high, but the corrected 2026 result now agrees with this model and lattice QCD predictions.
- This work demonstrates that accounting for small electromagnetic corrections can resolve experimental discrepancies without invoking new physics.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.