AG-2026.04-1652·hep-ph
When JIMWLK evolution really matters: the example of incoherent diffraction
Authors
- T. Lappi
- D. N. Triantafyllopoulos
Abstract
We consider high energy scattering in the effective theory of the Color Glass Condensate. The most convenient degrees of freedom are Wilson lines encoding multiple gluon exchanges, whose evolution with energy follows the JIMWLK equation. Instead of using the latter, very often one resorts to a Gaussian Approximation (GA), which is known to be remarkably accurate in describing a wide class of multi-gluon correlators whose expansion in the weak scattering limit starts with an exchange of only two gluons. Here we demonstrate, both analytically and numerically, that such an approximation is not valid for correlators which start with an exchange of four gluons. As a main example, we focus on incoherent diffraction in photon-nucleus collisions and we show that the discrepancy between the JIMWLK and the GA results is driven by weak scattering and further persists in the regime where unitarity corrections begin to become important. The JIMWLK calculation leads to cross sections which are systematically larger in all kinematic regimes of interest.
Submitted
28 April 20262 weeks ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.26123
Summary
When describing certain rare high-energy scattering processes in nuclear collisions, a widely-used mathematical shortcut (Gaussian Approximation) significantly underestimates cross sections compared to the more complete JIMWLK equation.
- The Gaussian Approximation works well for processes involving two-gluon exchanges but fails for four-gluon exchanges, showing the approximation has clear limits.
- Incoherent diffraction in photon-nucleus collisions is a key example where this discrepancy matters, with JIMWLK predicting systematically larger cross sections across all relevant energies.
- This finding matters because it identifies when theorists must use the computationally heavier JIMWLK equation rather than the convenient shortcut, improving precision in predicting rare nuclear collision events.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.