AG-2026.04-1653·astro-ph.CO·cross-listed: astro-ph.IMhep-ph
Kinematic Lensing Ratio: Reviving Weak Lensing Cosmography as a Geometric Dark Energy Probe
Authors
- Qinxun LiUniversity of Utah
Abstract
We introduce the kinematic lensing ratio (KiLeR), a geometric dark-energy probe from weak lensing. Combining shear ratios with intrinsic galaxy shapes inferred from kinematics, KiLeR naturally mitigates most first-order lensing systematics, including redshift errors, intrinsic alignments, and baryonic effects. The forecast on Roman shows a 192% improvement in the state-of-the-art dark energy constraints from adding KiLeR, providing independent tests of the evolving dark energy hint in the DESI DR2 BAO+CMB+SN analysis. We quantify the science requirements on systematic and statistical error control and discuss the pathways towards KiLeR observation.
Submitted
28 April 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.26015
Summary
A new weak lensing technique called KiLeR combines galaxy shapes measured from their kinematics with light-bending patterns to measure dark energy while canceling out many measurement errors that plague standard methods.
- KiLeR uses galaxy rotation velocities to infer their actual shapes, then compares these to how lensing distorts the same galaxies—a ratio that naturally removes errors from redshift measurements, galaxy alignment biases, and matter clumping in galaxy clusters.
- Simulations with NASA's Roman Space Telescope show KiLeR could nearly triple current precision on dark energy properties, offering an independent check on hints of evolving dark energy from recent large-scale structure surveys.
- The method requires controlling subtle systematic errors in galaxy kinematics and weak lensing measurements, but represents a promising new angle on dark energy that complements existing techniques like supernovae and baryon acoustic oscillations.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.