AG-2026.04-1658·hep-ph
New insights into the $b\rightarrow c \bar{u}q$ puzzle through Top-Bottom synergies
Authors
- Jack Y. Araz
- Christoph Englert
- Matthew Kirk
- Gilberto Tetlalmatzi-Xolocotzi
Abstract
Anomalies in the non-leptonic $\bar{B}^0\rightarrow D^{(*)+}K^{(*)-}$ and $\bar{B}^0_s\rightarrow D^{(*)+}_sπ^-$ decays may be an indication of physics beyond the Standard Model, but the large deviations require strongly coupled new physics that should be visible at colliders. We explore three new directions that could lead to viable new physics models, performing a detailed collider study to examine the possible weakening of previously known constraints on additional $SU(2)_L$ doublets. Our results show that, despite the difficulty of probing $t\bar{t}$ final states, increasing the branching ratio to this decay mode does not significantly weaken the bounds on weak doublet scalars, as additionally existing charged Higgs searches are equally strong. Beyond this, we analyse a potentially large breakdown of QCD factorisation by including large-power corrections to $B$ decays, and the effect of diluting collider searches with multi-scalar extensions. We find that these typical model-building routes for constructing a viable scenario remain constrained by collider measurements, indicating that these non-leptonic anomalies remain among the most puzzling discrepancies from the SM.
Submitted
28 April 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.25998
Summary
Physicists investigate why certain B-meson decays deviate from Standard Model predictions, exploring whether new Higgs-like particles or QCD effects could explain the anomalies while avoiding collider detection.
- Rare B-meson decays show mysterious deviations from theory, but new physics particles needed to explain them would typically be caught by existing Large Hadron Collider experiments.
- Even if new Higgs-like doublet particles preferentially decay to top quarks, collider constraints remain strong enough to rule out most proposed solutions.
- The authors conclude that either these anomalies reflect subtle measurement issues rather than new physics, or any new particles must be remarkably well-hidden from current experiments.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.