AG-2026.04-1672·quant-ph
Protein folding on a 64 qubit trapped-ion hardware via counterdiabatic quantum optimization
Authors
- Alejandro Gomez Cadavid
- Pavle Nikačević
- Pranav Chandarana
- Sebastián V. Romero
- Enrique Solano
- Narendra N. Hegade
- Miguel Angel Lopez-Ruiz
- Claudio Girotto
- Hanna Linn
- Hakan Doga
- Evgeny Epifanovsky
- Panagiotis Kl. Barkoutsos
- Ananth Kaushik
- Martin Roetteler
Abstract
We report the largest trapped-ion hardware demonstration of lattice protein-folding optimization to date, using bias-field digitized counterdiabatic quantum optimization (BF-DCQO) on a fully connected 64-qubit Barium development system similar to the forthcoming IonQ Tempo line. Six peptide sequences with 14-16 amino-acid residues are encoded using a coarse-grained tetrahedral lattice model, yielding higher-order spin-glass Hamiltonians with long-range interactions involving up to five-body terms and mapped to 46-61 qubits. The resulting instances are demanding for near-term quantum hardware because low-energy configurations must satisfy backbone-geometry constraints while optimizing dense residue-contact interactions. BF-DCQO uses a non-variational bias-feedback mechanism, where low-energy samples from each round define longitudinal fields that guide subsequent quantum evolutions. Across the studied instances, BF-DCQO shifts raw sampled energy distributions toward lower energies than uniform random sampling, with the strongest improvements appearing in residue-contact variables. To preserve this signal, we introduce a consensus-based post-processing pipeline that combines quantum-learned contact information with feasible backbone geometries. The resulting hybrid workflow reaches the classical reference energy in multiple instances and improves over the corresponding random-seeded pipeline. These results show that BF-DCQO can generate structured samples for dense protein-folding Hamiltonians at previously unexplored trapped-ion scales.
Submitted
29 April 2026today
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.26861
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.