AG-2026.04-1683·quant-ph
Delayed Choice Phenomena in the Projection Evolution Model
Authors
- Marek Góźdź
- Andrzej Góźdź
- Krzysztof Lider
Abstract
In the Schrödinger evolution of a quantum state time enters as a real parameter representing the coordinate. In a more consistent approach time should be defined as a quantum observable, with the evolution taking place in a four-dimensional spacetime. This is possible in the projection evolution model in which the wave function is defined in both space and time. This allows to construct the time operator and discuss the temporal structure of quantum processes. In this paper we discuss a photon travelling through a Mach-Zehnder interferometer, focusing the description on the temporal profile of the wave function. We show that in this approach the delayed-choice experiments can be explained by the temporal overlap of the photon and the devices in the interferometer.
Submitted
29 April 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.26716
Summary
A quantum framework treating time as an observable rather than a parameter explains delayed-choice experiments through the temporal structure of wave functions in an interferometer.
- Standard quantum mechanics treats time as an external clock, but this model promotes time to a quantum observable that the system evolves in, similar to how position and momentum are observables.
- The approach naturally explains delayed-choice experiments—where measurement choice seems to retroactively affect the particle's past—by tracking when the photon's wave function overlaps in time with different device components.
- This shifts the puzzle from 'how can the future affect the past?' to 'what is the particle's temporal profile?', offering a different conceptual handle on one of quantum mechanics' most counterintuitive features.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.