AG-2026.04-1724·quant-ph
An Exponential Advantage for Adaptive Tomography of Structured States under Pauli Basis Measurements
Authors
- Alireza Goldar
- Zhen Qin
- Zhihui Zhu
- Zhe-Xuan Gong
- Michael B. Wakin
Abstract
Broad claims about whether adaptivity helps in quantum state tomography can be misleading unless the state family, measurement architecture, and error metric are specified carefully. We study a restricted but physically important regime: single-copy quantum state tomography under local Pauli basis measurements, where the allowed measurement settings are tensor-product measurement operators built from local single-qubit Pauli operators, and performance is measured in trace distance with high probability in a minimax sense over a known structured family. We construct an explicit discrete prefix/tree family of states for which adaptive measurement selection achieves polynomial copy complexity, while every non-adaptive design requires exponentially many copies in the worst case. The adaptive upper bound comes from stagewise prefix recovery using hierarchical breadcrumb information revealed by partial prefix matches. The non-adaptive lower bound is based on a rare-prefix mechanism: every fixed design under-samples some deep prefix subset, and outside that subset the competing hypotheses induce identical one-shot laws, so only an exponentially small fraction of the measurement budget contributes to the KL divergence between the full data distributions. The result isolates a concrete regime in which adaptivity provably changes the sample-complexity scaling under the experimentally common local Pauli measurement architecture.
Submitted
28 April 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.26043
Summary
Adaptive measurement strategies can exponentially outperform fixed measurement plans for identifying certain structured quantum states using local Pauli measurements, a gap the authors prove is unavoidable for non-adaptive approaches.
- The authors construct a specific family of quantum states where adaptive measurement selection requires only polynomial samples, but any fixed measurement design needs exponentially many—the first rigorous proof of such a separation under realistic experimental constraints.
- Adaptivity works by using early measurement results to guide where to focus later measurements (like a hierarchical search), while non-adaptive designs inevitably under-sample some key features of the state, wasting most measurement data.
- This result matters because local Pauli measurements are standard in quantum labs, so it suggests real experimental advantages for adaptive protocols—though only for certain state structures that must be known in advance.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.