AG-2026.04-1746·quant-ph
Pulse Quality Optimisation in Quantum Optimal Control
Authors
- Dylan Lewis
- Roeland Wiersema
Abstract
Quantum optimal control methods are widely used to design experimental control pulses such as laser amplitudes, phases, or detunings, that implement a target unitary evolution. In practice, what makes a pulse "good" depends not only on its fidelity, but also on the experimental setting and the relevant hardware constraints. Here, we introduce geometric quantum control with kernel optimisation (GECKO), a model-agnostic method for improving control pulses after a high-fidelity solution has been found. GECKO uses the Riemannian geometry of the special unitary group to identify directions in pulse space that leave the implemented unitary unchanged to first order, allowing one to traverse level sets of the control landscape while optimising a chosen differentiable pulse-quality function. We demonstrate GECKO on a transverse-field Ising Hamiltonian implementing CZ and CNOT gates, optimising pulse properties including spectral filtering, smoothness, robustness to parameter deviations, and pulse duration. In all cases, GECKO finds substantially improved pulse solutions.
Submitted
28 April 20263 weeks ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.25768
Summary
Researchers developed GECKO, a method that improves quantum control pulses by tweaking them along mathematically safe directions that preserve the intended quantum operation while optimizing for practical constraints like smoothness or robustness.
- GECKO uses the geometry of quantum state space to find 'flat directions' in pulse design—adjustments that don't degrade the core operation, letting engineers trade off fidelity against real-world concerns.
- The method is hardware-agnostic and works after a good solution exists, meaning it can be layered onto any existing quantum control algorithm to polish results for experimental reality.
- Demonstrations on two-qubit gates show GECKO simultaneously improves multiple practical properties (noise robustness, smoothness, duration) that labs care about but standard fidelity-only optimization ignores.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.