AG-2026.04-1752·quant-ph
Ground-state energies of Ising models calculated using the samples from a quantum computer that simulates short-time evolution
Authors
- John P. T. Stenger
- C. Stephen Hellberg
- Daniel Gunlycke
Abstract
We find the ground-state energy of the Ising model using the Cascaded Variational Quantum Eigensolver (CVQE) algorithm with the Guided-Sampling Ansatz (GSA) using up to 63 qubits on a quantum computer. We study a heavy-hex lattice to match the qubit architecture, allowing us to perform calculations in the quantum utility regime. We study both a homogeneous and random-coupling model. We locate the boundary of acceptable quantum errors as a function of the number of qubits and coupling strength. An entropic analysis is performed giving insights into the quantum computing performance. A subspace analysis is performed that suggests that the Ising model is especially suited for near-term quantum computing.
Submitted
28 April 20261 week ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.25715
Summary
Researchers used a quantum computer with 63 qubits to find ground-state energies of Ising models, demonstrating that this physics problem may be particularly well-suited for near-term quantum computers despite current noise limitations.
- The Cascaded Variational Quantum Eigensolver (CVQE) algorithm paired with a Guided-Sampling Ansatz enabled quantum computers to reach useful computational results on Ising models without requiring error correction—a key milestone for 'quantum utility.'
- The researchers mapped the problem to the physical layout of superconducting qubits (heavy-hex lattice), showing how tailoring algorithms to hardware architecture can reduce noise's impact.
- Entropy and subspace analysis revealed that Ising models have structural properties making them more forgiving of quantum errors than some other problems, suggesting where near-term quantum advantage might first arrive.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.