AG-2026.04-1768·quant-ph
Defect-Adaptive Lattice Surgery on Irregular Boundary Surface-Code Patches
Authors
- GunSik Min
- Yujin Kang
- Jun Heo
Abstract
Defect-adaptive surface-code methods have substantially advanced the construction of valid logical patches on imperfect hardware, but fault-tolerant computation also requires executable logical oper ations on the resulting irregular geometries. We formulate the seam-boundary defect problem: how to perform a lattice-surgery merge when the intended seam intersects deformed boundaries, disabled checks, and gauge-inferred super-stabilizers. We introduce a defect-adaptive lattice-surgery method that reconstructs the target joint logical parity from the seam-related measurements available on the irregular merged patch, together with constraints inherited from the separated pre-merge code space. The reconstruction is expressed as a compact GF(2) binary-support synthesis problem. If the requested parity is realizable, the solution gives an executable parity-extraction rule over raw, schedule-tagged gauge outcomes; otherwise, it certifies a parity-synthesis failure rather than conflat ing it with patch invalidity. The framework accommodates boundary data-qubit defects, seam-check ancilla defects, and gauge-inferred seam super-checks within a single synthesis layer. Circuit-level samples of the synthesized merge operation show improved compile yield, preserved effective dis tance, and only modest success-conditioned logical-error overhead relative to the defect-free merge reference; an explicit ZZ-merge sampling check confirms the expected transposed-geometry behav ior under the same success-conditioned observable construction. More broadly, the results identify certified parity synthesis as a compilation layer between defect-adaptive patch construction and executable fault-tolerant logical operations on imperfect surface-code hardware.
Submitted
28 April 2026yesterday
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.25524
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.