AG-2026.04-1774·quant-ph
Ember: An Extensible Benchmark Suite for Quantum Annealing Embedding Algorithms
Authors
- Zachary Macaskill-Smith
- Unmol Sharma
- Melissa Warner
- Kálmán Varga
- David A. B. Hyde
Abstract
Minor embedding is a required compilation step for quantum annealing, mapping logical problem graphs onto sparse hardware topologies. Despite its central role in determining solution quality, no standardized benchmark exists for comparing embedding algorithms: prior studies use incompatible graph libraries, inconsistent metrics, and non-reproducible experimental setups, making cross-algorithm comparisons unreliable. We present Ember (Embedding Minor Benchmark for Evaluative Reproducibility), an open-source benchmarking framework addressing this gap. Ember provides a standardized algorithm interface with seeded, reproducible execution infrastructure; a diverse graph library of 24,016 instances spanning structured, random, and physics-motivated problem types not previously used in embedding benchmarks; and a unified analysis pipeline supporting all three current D-Wave hardware topologies (Chimera, Pegasus, Zephyr). We evaluate five algorithms across the full library on Chimera and find that no algorithm dominates universally: rankings vary systematically with graph structure, and the best algorithm depends on the family being embedded. We also examine the effects of hardware topology (including Pegasus and Zephyr), qubit error rates, and evaluate a reinforcement-learning approach (CHARME) within a narrower test set. Ember is available at https://github.com/zachmacsmith/ember and is installable via pip install ember-qc.
Submitted
28 April 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.25433
Summary
Ember is an open-source benchmark suite that standardizes how researchers test quantum annealing embedding algorithms—the step that maps optimization problems onto quantum hardware—revealing that no single algorithm works best across all problem types.
- Embedding is a critical but unstandardized step in quantum annealing; previous studies used incompatible tools and metrics, making it impossible to fairly compare different algorithms.
- Ember's library of 24,016 diverse test problems and unified interface shows that embedding algorithm performance varies dramatically by problem structure—what works for physics-motivated graphs fails on random ones.
- The framework supports all three D-Wave hardware topologies and is freely available, enabling reproducible research and helping practitioners choose the right embedding method for their problem.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.