AG-2026.04-1775·physics.comp-ph·cross-listed: quant-ph
Deterministic Realization of Classical Dissipation on Quantum Computers
Authors
- Muhammad Idrees Khan
- Sauro Succi
- Hua-Dong Yao
Abstract
Lattice Boltzmann (LB) on quantum devices must reconcile unitary gate evolution with the dissipative \emph{collision} step. In the multiple-relaxation-time (MRT) class, we work in the common setting of \emph{modewise diagonal} moment relaxation, $δm_r'=λ_r\,δm_r$ with $λ_r\in[-1,1]$ (overrelaxation if $λ_r<0$). Embedding that contraction in a unitary by block encoding or a linear combination of unitaries (LCU) typically yields subunitary success probability that decays multiplicatively across modes, sites, and time, a key bottleneck for quantum LB. \emph{For the dissipative MRT block alone} we give a \emph{block-encoding-free} construction: a signed \emph{two-rail} population encoding, then a completely positive trace-preserving (CPTP) map (per-rail amplitude damping with survival $|λ_r|$ and, if $λ_r<0$, a rail SWAP) so that, after the decode, the map agrees with classical MRT relaxation exactly (expectations of the rail number operators, common encoding--decode scale). Trace preservation gives success probability $1$ for that substage. The main result is the dissipative MRT block; construction of the equilibrium moment vector~$m^{\mathrm{eq}}=Mf^{\mathrm{eq}}$ (prescribed~$f^{\mathrm{eq}}$, host moment matrix~$M$; notation as in Section~\ref{subsec:generic-mrt}), moment transforms, streaming, and boundaries are composed with it as in a standard host pipeline and lie outside the scope of the formal theorem. Hybrid and fully coherent encodings, adaptive scales, Carleman-based context, and a one-rail no-go in the same nonnegative population framework are in the main text. Audits of the open-channel map on a long LBM collide-stream simulation and on stencil-free inputs both match the target to machine precision.
Submitted
28 April 2026yesterday
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.25429
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.