AG-2026.04-1819·astro-ph.GA
Dust enrichment from core-collapse supernovae and extinction curves in the high-redshift universe
Authors
- Koki Otaki
- Raffaella Schneider
- Simone Bianchi
- Joris Witstok
- Luca Graziani
- Marco Limongi
- Roberto Maiolino
Abstract
Recent JWST observations have revealed that some galaxies at $z \gtrsim 7$ generally exhibit relatively flat ultraviolet (UV) attenuation curves and a weak UV bump. These features suggest that the first dust grains formed rapidly, possibly originating from core-collapse supernovae (SNe). We investigate the time evolution of grain size distributions and extinction curves in the early phase of dust enrichment for different parameters of progenitor stars, rotation velocities, metallicity, and interstellar medium densities, including the effect of the reverse shock. We model a single starburst system assuming an initial mass function. Extinction curves are calculated from the grain size distribution for each dust species. The total dust-to-stellar mass ratio at $30 \,\mathrm{Myr}$ is $M_\mathrm{dust}/M_\star \sim 10^{-3}$ before the passage of the reverse shock, but we find it to be at most $M_\mathrm{dust}/M_\star \sim 10^{-5}$ due to the destruction effect of the reverse shock. This effect destroys grains smaller than $\sim 10\,\mathrm{nm}$ and makes amorphous carbon the dominant species, resulting in a flatter extinction curve with a wide bump at $2500\,\mathrm{\mathring{A}}$ compared to the no-reverse shock models. We find that our models are consistent with the observed attenuation curve and emissivity of high-redshift galaxies and show that the reverse shock processing significantly affects dust enrichment and grain properties such as extinction curves and emissivity in supernova yields for high-redshift galaxies.
Submitted
29 April 2026today
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.26750
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.