AG-2026.04-1826·astro-ph.GA
Resolved Maps of Gas and Dust in a Massive Quiescent Galaxy at z=2 from INQUEST-JWST: Evidence of Accretion and Rejuvenation
Authors
- Sai Gangula
- Andrew B. Newman
- Meng Gu
- Sirio Belli
- Katherine E. Whitaker
- Tania M. Barone
- Aliza Beverage
- Andrea Bolamperti
- Letizia Bugiani
- Richard S. Ellis
- Mariska Kriek
- Allison Matthews
- Themiya Nanayakkara
Abstract
Quiescent galaxies in the distant universe exhibit a range of gas content that may indicate a variety of quenching processes are at play. Mapping the distribution and kinematics of the gas can illuminate its origins, but nearly all such observations have been unresolved. We present JWST/NIRSpec IFU observations of MRG-M0138, a gravitationally lensed, massive quiescent galaxy at $z\sim2$ observed as part of the INQUEST-JWST survey. We use Na I D absorption, which we detect in excess of the stellar absorption over most of the galaxy, to trace the kinematics and spatial distribution of the neutral gas in 219 spatial bins. The gas exhibits clear rotation that is kinematically aligned with the stellar disk. Both the gas and dust have a complex spatial structure, including an off-nuclear clump, a dust lane, and patches in the outer disk. The non-equilibrium distribution suggests that the gas was accreted. Analysis of the galaxy's star formation history supports this interpretation by indicating a rejuvenation event 500 Myrs ago. We identify two plausibly associated galaxies and suggest that tidal interactions are a likely source of the accreted gas. Our results indicate that some of the variation in gas content among early quiescent galaxies is not related to differences in gas consumption timescales. The detection of a gas clump at a projected distance of $\sim90$ pc from the known supermassive black hole illustrates a mechanism to fuel the episodic AGN feedback that may maintain quiescence.
Submitted
29 April 2026yesterday
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.26195
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.