AG-2026.04-1856·gr-qc·cross-listed: astro-ph.COhep-ph
Gravitational wave constraints on the Paneitz operator
Authors
- Robin Valtin
- Alexander Ganz
- Guillem Domènech
Abstract
The Paneitz operator is a dimension-4 conformally invariant fourth-order differential operator that has recently attracted attention for possible cancellations of the vacuum energy. We show that, in four dimensions, the Paneitz operator acting on a scalar field falls within the class of extended mimetic gravity theories. Thus, it exhibits the usual instabilities of mimetic gravity. Assuming such instabilities are cured by higher derivative terms, we derive constraints on the Paneitz operator from a modified propagation speed of gravitational waves, after including the Einstein-Hilbert action in the mimetic gravity formulation.
Submitted
30 April 20261 week ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.27568
Summary
The Paneitz operator, a mathematical tool proposed to cancel vacuum energy in gravity, actually belongs to a problematic class of theories with instabilities that can be constrained by measuring how fast gravitational waves travel.
- The Paneitz operator—a sophisticated fourth-order mathematical operator—doesn't provide the vacuum-energy benefits hoped for; it's mathematically equivalent to 'mimetic gravity,' a framework known to harbor instabilities.
- Gravitational wave observations offer a practical way to test and constrain the Paneitz operator: any real-world version would have to match the observed speed of gravitational waves, which are known to travel at light speed.
- This result tempers enthusiasm for the Paneitz operator as a solution to deep theoretical problems in quantum gravity and suggests that fixing its flaws would require adding even more complex mathematical terms to the theory.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.