AG-2026.04-1860·gr-qc·cross-listed: astro-ph.HE
Agnostically decoding gravitational wave model deficiencies in GWTC-3
Authors
- Guillaume Dideron
- Suvodip Mukherjee
- Luis Lehner
Abstract
Gravitational Wave (GW) data bring an exceptional avenue to test the underlying models of coalescing compact objects. In the regime of strong gravity and high curvature, they allow the exploration of minute deviations from the best-fit models, which are difficult to uncover with other observational modalities. These deviations can stem from departures from General Relativity (GR) or unaccounted astrophysical effects. They may not be explainable within the current description of GW strain data, or may simply be difficult to model. However, they are expected to be correlated between detectors and across the population of observed events. The recently developed SCoRe analysis pipeline leverages these properties by focusing on the correlated power between detectors and combining results from multiple events. In this paper, we apply the framework on the Third Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog to search for source-dependent deviations. In particular, we explore whether there is evidence for a mass-scale in the observed events, which can act like a line of demarcation in their physical properties by exhibiting a deviation that is different above and below this mass-scale. This mass scale dependency naturally arises in gravitational theories described through effective field theories, due to environmental effects or in scenarios involving exotic compact objects, where the GW signature can differ from the standard binary black holes in GR. Using the 30 highest Signal-to-Noise Ratio events in the catalog, we find Bayes factors ranging from 0.16--0.5 (depending on where the threshold mass is set), thus disfavoring the hypothesis of existence of any mass-scale between $\sim 2.5$ M$_\odot$ and $60$ M$_\odot$. We also compute the distribution of excess cross-correlated power across events and find a Bayes factor of $0.07$, which agrees with expected noise statistics.
Submitted
29 April 2026yesterday
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.27185
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.