AG-2026.04-1886·nucl-th·cross-listed: hep-th
Unmasking Hidden Wigner's Symmetry from First Principles
Authors
- Phong Dang
- Daniel Langr
- Tomas Dytrych
- Jerry P. Draayer
- David Kekejian
Abstract
We present quantitative evidence that high-quality internucleon forces derived from $χ$EFT exhibit a striking dominance of Wigner's supermultiplet symmetry, without invoking the large-$N_c$ limit of QCD or assumptions about specific nuclei. We trace the manifestation of this symmetry in nuclear structure using the \textit{ab initio} Symmetry Adapted Model (SAM) and identify suppressed spin-isospin polarizability. Our calculations show that a majority of $\rm ^4He$, $\rm ^6Li$, and $\rm ^6He$ wave functions is concentrated in a few $\rm U(4)$ irreducible representations, without imposing any \textit{a priori} constraints on the model space. This emergent feature points to a strategy for reducing explosive many-body bases of the NCSM while retaining physically important configurations needed to compute observables.
Submitted
29 April 20261 week ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.27144
Summary
Nuclear forces derived from modern effective field theory naturally exhibit Wigner's supermultiplet symmetry, allowing physicists to dramatically simplify calculations of light nuclei by focusing on a small subset of quantum configurations.
- Wigner's symmetry emerges spontaneously in realistic nuclear forces without assuming special limits of quantum chromodynamics, suggesting it's a fundamental feature rather than an approximation.
- Most of the quantum wave function for light nuclei like helium-4 and lithium-6 concentrates in just a few symmetric patterns, revealing an unexpected simplicity hiding in the complexity.
- This finding offers a practical shortcut: physicists can prune massive computational models of nuclei by keeping only the symmetric configurations that matter, making ab initio calculations more tractable.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.