AG-2026.04-1894·hep-ph
Mapping data sensitivities in global QCD analysis with linear response and influence functions
Authors
- Richard Whitehill
Abstract
Global QCD analyses provide the primary framework for extracting hadron structure from experimental data, yet the mechanisms by which data constrain non-perturbative functions remain difficult to interpret due to the high dimensionality and complexity of these fits. Here we develop a framework based on linear response and influence functions, which are gradient-based sensitivity measures that directly quantify how experimental information propagates to fitted quantities and observables. These quantities cleanly expose how data locally determines the central values and uncertainties of quantum correlation functions, as well as the correlations between them, providing a transparent and general framework for diagnosing information flow in inverse problems in QCD.
Submitted
30 April 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.28154
Summary
Physicists developed a method using influence functions to transparently map how experimental data constrains the fundamental properties of protons and neutrons in global QCD analyses, making these complex fits interpretable.
- Influence functions act like sensitivity maps showing exactly which data points most strongly constrain which properties of hadrons, cutting through the 'black box' of high-dimensional fitting.
- The framework reveals not just which experiments matter, but *how* their information propagates through the analysis—clarifying correlations between different measured quantities.
- This diagnostic tool helps physicists understand whether their experimental constraints are robust and where new measurements would have the most impact on fundamental nuclear structure parameters.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.