AG-2026.04-1897·hep-ph·cross-listed: hep-ex
Phenomenology of $f_2(1270)$ photoproduction at energies measured with the CLAS facility
Authors
- K. E. S. Mendes
- D. T da Silva
- M. L. L. da Silva
Abstract
We investigate the photoproduction of the tensor meson $f_2(1270)$ on the proton within a Regge-based framework, focusing on the reaction $γp \to p f_2(1270)$ in the few-GeV energy region. The production mechanism is modeled through the exchange of vector-meson Regge trajectories in the $t$-channel, including both $ρ$ and $ω$ exchanges with phenomenologically motivated couplings. The scattering amplitudes are derived using Reggeized propagators and effective hadronic vertices, allowing for the calculation of differential cross sections in the narrow-width approximation. We further extend the analysis to the $π^+π^-$ invariant mass distribution by incorporating a relativistic Breit--Wigner description of the $f_2(1270)$ resonance.
Submitted
30 April 20261 week ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.28063
Summary
Physicists modeled how photons produce a specific type of meson (f₂) when hitting protons using a theoretical framework that explains particle exchanges, matching experimental data from the CLAS detector.
- The team used Regge theory—a technique for handling particle exchanges at moderate energies—to predict the detailed angular and energy distributions of f₂ mesons created in photon-proton collisions.
- By including both ρ and ω meson exchanges in their model, they reproduced the experimental cross sections measured by CLAS, validating that these specific particle pathways dominate the production mechanism.
- The work connects abstract particle-physics theory to real detector measurements, helping physicists understand how quantum forces create rare mesons and testing the limits of Regge theory in the few-GeV energy regime.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.