AG-2026.04-1898·hep-ph·cross-listed: astro-ph.HE
Semi-analytic bounds on axion-like-particle supernovae emission
Authors
- Ana Luisa Foguel
- Eduardo S. Fraga
Abstract
Core-collapse supernovae provide natural laboratories for the production of new light particles. In particular, axion-like particles (ALPs) can be constrained via SN1987A cooling arguments. However, significant astrophysical and nuclear uncertainties imply that such bounds may vary strongly depending on modeling choices, even when expensive simulations are employed. In this context, semi-analytic methods offer a simple and fast alternative for deriving new-physics constraints. Building on a previous semi-analytic framework, in which proto-neutron star (PNS) observables are expressed in terms of six global PNS parameters, we include a finite ALP mass in the calculation and derive bounds in the axion-nucleon coupling versus mass plane. The obtained bounds are in good agreement with previous results from numerical simulations, demonstrating the robustness of the method. We also illustrate the sensitivity of the bounds to different PNS parameter calibrations, nuclear effects and cooling exclusion criteria.
Submitted
30 April 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.28062
Summary
Researchers develop a fast semi-analytic method to constrain hypothetical axion-like particles using supernova cooling data, finding results consistent with expensive computer simulations while clearly showing how uncertainties affect the bounds.
- Axion-like particles (hypothetical light particles beyond the Standard Model) would carry energy away from supernovae, and observing SN1987A's cooling rate lets physicists constrain how strongly these particles interact with normal matter.
- The new semi-analytic framework bypasses computationally expensive simulations by using six key parameters of the proto-neutron star core, making it fast enough to explore how different assumptions change the final constraints.
- The method's predictions match detailed simulations well, but the authors show that nuclear physics details and calibration choices can shift the allowed particle properties by significant amounts—a reminder that astrophysical constraints on new physics depend on choices beyond just the data.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.