AG-2026.04-1910·hep-ph
Planar master integrals for two-loop NLO electroweak light-fermion contributions to $g g \rightarrow Z H$
Authors
- Shu-Xiang Li
- Ren-You Zhang
- Xiao-Feng Wang
- Pan-Feng Li
- Xiang-Jie Wei
- Yi Wang
- Yi Jiang
- Qing-hai Wang
Abstract
For the two-loop next-to-leading-order electroweak (NLO EW) corrections to $gg \rightarrow ZH$, the light-fermion contributions can be classified into eight distinct topologies. Using the canonical differential-equations method, we perform an analytic computation of the master integrals (MIs) associated with the four planar topologies. Canonical bases are constructed using the Magnus-expansion method, and the resulting alphabets consist of algebraic symbol letters involving nontrivial radicals. We develop a systematic framework for identifying the radical structures of the canonical MIs, enabling their organization into suitable subsystems and, whenever possible, their representation in terms of Goncharov polylogarithms (GPLs) up to $\mathcal{O}(ε^4)$. Only a few MIs at $\mathcal{O}(ε^3)$ and $\mathcal{O}(ε^4)$ are instead represented as one-fold integrals over GPLs, due to the presence of nested square roots that obstruct the simultaneous rationalization of all radicals.
Submitted
30 April 2026yesterday
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.27314
Summary
Physicists computed the complex mathematical integrals needed to predict two-loop electroweak corrections to a key Higgs production process at the LHC, using advanced techniques to handle radical expressions that typically resist simplification.
- This work calculates master integrals for the gg→ZH process with two-loop electroweak corrections, essential for precise LHC Higgs predictions beyond leading order.
- The team developed new methods to handle algebraic radicals (nested square roots) that appear in these integrals, organizing them systematically using the Magnus-expansion method.
- Most results are expressed as Goncharov polylogarithms—a standard form that enables efficient numerical evaluation—though a few particularly stubborn integrals required one-fold integral representations.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.