AG-2026.04-1924·quant-ph
Source-independent quantum key distribution without pre-sending entanglement
Authors
- Rong-Zheng Liu
- Hua-Lei Yin
Abstract
Quantum key distribution (QKD) theoretically offers information-theoretic security. The prevailing approach is the prepare-and-measure BB84 protocol, which implements QKD using conventional laser rather than single-photon source via the decoy-state method. However, side-channel attacks targeting sources severely threaten system security. Despite extensive efforts, including fully passive scheme, this vulnerability persists even with perfect single-photon source. Here, we propose a source-independent (SI) QKD protocol that resolves all known and unknown source-side attacks without pre-sending entanglement source. Aligning with advances in quantum light sources, our protocol simultaneously doubles the transmission distance while remaining robustness against imperfection of source. Theoretical analysis shows that non-classical light source provides practical security advantages unattainable with conventional laser.
Submitted
30 April 2026today
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.28089
Summary
A new quantum key distribution protocol that eliminates vulnerabilities from imperfect light sources—the main attack vector in current systems—while doubling transmission distance without requiring pre-shared entanglement.
- Current QKD systems are vulnerable to 'source-side attacks' that exploit imperfections in the light sources themselves; this protocol makes the security independent of source quality.
- The protocol achieves twice the transmission distance of existing approaches while remaining robust against source imperfections, making it more practical for real-world deployment.
- Using non-classical light sources (rather than conventional lasers) provides genuine security advantages that classical light cannot match—a shift in what 'quantum' advantage actually means here.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.