AG-2026.04-1935·math-ph·cross-listed: math.FAmath.SPquant-ph
Hypergeometric Functions of Nilpotent Operators: Functional Collapse and Structural Depth at Exceptional Points
Authors
- Ramon Moya
Abstract
We study hypergeometric functions of nilpotent operators in finite-dimensional settings, motivated by the algebraic structure of exceptional points in non-Hermitian quantum mechanics. Our starting point is the following exact result: if N is a nilpotent operator of index m+1 in an associative algebra over C, then every generalized hypergeometric function pFq evaluated at N reduces to a finite polynomial in N of degree at most m, without any analytic convergence requirement. This "functional collapse" is distinct from the classical parameter-termination mechanism and arises purely from the nilpotent structure of the argument. The main result is a "nilpotent depth criterion" (Theorem 2): if the first non-constant coefficient of a formal series F appears in degree r >= 1, then the nilpotent part F(N) - F(0)I has nilpotency index bounded above by ceil((m+1)/r). We apply this criterion to Hamiltonians at exceptional points, where H = lambda I + N with N^{m+1} = 0. Theorem 3 establishes that a function F analytic at lambda reduces the Jordan depth of the exceptional point from m+1 to at most ceil((m+1)/r), where r is the contact order of F at lambda. As consequences: the time evolution operator e^{tH} preserves the full Jordan depth for all t != 0; a function with a zero of order m+1 at lambda annihilates the entire Jordan structure; and the order of the pole of the modified resolvent is reduced from m+1 to at most m+1-r. Results are illustrated with explicit 3x3 Jordan block computations for 1F1, 2F1, and the time evolution operator, confirming sharpness of the bounds.
Submitted
30 April 2026today
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.27834
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.