AG-2026.04-1937·quant-ph
Compressed Sensing for Efficient Fidelity Estimation of GHZ States
Authors
- Farrokh Labib
- David Nicholaeff
- Vincent Russo
- William J. Zeng
Abstract
Accurately characterizing multipartite entangled states is a critical challenge in quantum information processing. In this work, we focus on applying compressed sensing techniques to efficiently estimate the fidelity of Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) states. By exploiting the inherent sparsity of these states, our compressed sensing protocol drastically reduces the measurement overhead traditionally required for state verification while maintaining high accuracy. To evaluate the practical performance of this approach, we test the protocol on GHZ states using both quantum simulators and Quantinuum's trapped-ion hardware. Furthermore, we implement error detection techniques during our hardware evaluations, demonstrating the robustness and viability of compressed sensing for fidelity estimation in noisy experimental environments.
Submitted
30 April 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.27824
Summary
Researchers use compressed sensing to efficiently verify GHZ states—highly entangled quantum systems—by dramatically cutting the number of measurements needed, while maintaining accuracy even on real quantum hardware.
- Compressed sensing exploits sparsity in GHZ states to reduce measurement overhead, similar to how sparse signals can be reconstructed from fewer samples in classical signal processing.
- The approach was validated on both simulated and real trapped-ion quantum computers, showing it works in practice despite the noise inherent in current quantum devices.
- This matters because verifying entangled states is expensive on quantum hardware; more efficient fidelity estimation makes it easier to benchmark quantum computers and build practical quantum applications.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.