AG-2026.04-1946·quant-ph
An Analytical Approach to Design Space Exploration for Cavity-Mediated Quantum State Transfer in Multi-core Architectures
Authors
- Biel Pons Zaragoza
- Junaid Khan
- Rohit Sarma Sarkar
- Sahar Ben Rached
- Carmen G. Almudever
- Eduard Alarcon
- Sergi Abadal
Abstract
In multi-core quantum computing architectures, waveguide-mediated interconnects are essential for facilitating fast, high-fidelity quantum state transfer between qubits located in different chips. However, optimizing these systems typically relies on computationally expensive numerical simulations that offer limited physical insight. In this work, we derive exact analytical expressions for the state transfer dynamics of a two-qubit system coupled via a waveguide, modeled through a Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian and the Lindblad master equation. We apply the Monte Carlo wave-function method and obtain a closed-form solution for qubit occupation probabilities that accounts for both detuning and dissipative losses. Our analytical framework provides a significant computational speedup compared to standard numerical solvers, enabling large-scale parameter sweeps while maintaining high precision in both fidelity and latency predictions. Furthermore, the model reveals and explains systematic low-fidelity regions arising from destructive interference between internal oscillations and detuning-induced envelopes, which are phenomena that are difficult to characterize through numerical means alone. Finally, we propose a simplified latency model and an efficiency-based function to enable rapid identification of optimal operating points. This analytical approach provides a robust foundation for the design and optimization of interconnects in multi-core quantum processors.
Submitted
30 April 2026yesterday
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.27664
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.