AG-2026.04-1980·quant-ph·cross-listed: cond-mat.str-elmath.QA
Resolving spurious topological entanglement entropy in stabilizer codes
Authors
- Peilun Han
- Zijian Liang
- Yifei Wang
- Bowen Yang
- Yingfei Gu
- Yu-An Chen
Abstract
Topological entanglement entropy (TEE) is a key diagnostic of long-range entanglement in two-dimensional gapped phases of matter, but it can suffer from spurious contributions that overestimate the total quantum dimension of the underlying topological order. In this work, we identify the microscopic origin of spurious TEE and introduce a concave partition for computing the Levin-Wen TEE of translation-invariant stabilizer codes of prime-dimensional qudits. We rigorously prove that this prescription is free of spurious contributions. As a complementary probe, we study bivariate bicycle codes on a bipartite cylinder and show that the entanglement entropy depends sensitively on the cylinder circumference, revealing topological frustration of the underlying anyons.
Submitted
29 April 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.27053
Summary
Researchers fix a longstanding measurement problem in quantum error-correcting codes, where calculating topological entanglement entropy gives inflated values by using a smarter way to partition the system.
- Topological entanglement entropy is supposed to reveal hidden quantum order, but standard methods include artifacts that make the system look more entangled than it really is.
- The authors pinpoint what causes these spurious signals and propose a new partition geometry that eliminates them for a broad class of quantum codes.
- Testing on 'bicycle codes' shows their method also reveals how anyons (exotic quasiparticles) interact with the code's geometry—a previously hidden signature.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.