AG-2026.04-2042·physics.flu-dyn·cross-listed: cond-mat.stat-mechmath-ph
Constitutive Modelling of Korteweg Fluids Using Liu's Method
Authors
- Zagorka Matić
- Srboljub Simić
- Peter Ván
Abstract
The paper studies constitutive modelling of Korteweg fluids. Thermodynamic consistency, i.e. compatibility with entropy balance law, is achieved using Liu's method of multipliers. Appropriate constitutive assumptions facilitated inclusion of the capillary effects in the specific entropy. Korteweg stresses are derived from the equilibrium conditions -- vanishing of the entropy production and its minimization in equilibrium. Material parameter in Korteweg stresses is allowed to depend on temperature, which turns out to be consistent with kinetic-theory results and leads to cross-coupling of mechanical and thermal effects. The generalized Gibbs' relation, which inherits the capillary effects, is derived as consequence, which is a peculiar feature of the Liu's method.
Submitted
29 April 20262 weeks ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.26846
Summary
Researchers develop a thermodynamically consistent framework for fluids with capillary effects (Korteweg fluids) by enforcing entropy balance, revealing how temperature-dependent material properties couple mechanical and thermal behavior.
- Liu's method of multipliers ensures any constitutive model respects entropy laws—a safeguard against thermodynamic violations that plague ad-hoc fluid models.
- Temperature-dependent capillary stresses naturally emerge from equilibrium conditions, explaining why heating and mechanical deformation interact in these fluids rather than acting independently.
- The framework recovers a generalized Gibbs relation (the fundamental thermodynamic identity) as a consequence rather than an assumption, grounding the model in deeper physical principles.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.