AG-2026.04-2056·physics.plasm-ph
X-Ray Diagnostics Analysis Verification and Exploration (xDAVE) Code for the Prediction and Interpretation of X-Ray Thomson Scattering Experiments
Authors
- Hannah M. Bellenbaum
- Dave A. Chapman
- Maximilian P. Böhme
- Thomas Gawne
- Sebastian Schwalbe
- Willow M. Martin
- Michael Bussmann
- Dirk O. Gericke
- Uwe Hernandez Acosta
- Jan Vorberger
- Tobias Dornheim
Abstract
X-ray Thomson scattering (XRTS) is a common diagnostic used in the warm dense matter (WDM) regime to estimate plasma parameters like density, temperature and charge state. Experimental analysis typically relies on a forward model to obtain estimates for these parameters, as the measured spectrum is a convolution of the dynamic structure factor (DSF) and the source-instrument function. The Chihara decomposition, where the spectrum is separated into contributions from bound and free electrons, is commonly used to estimate DSFs in the WDM regime, as it allows for the fast calculation of DSFs and therefore can easily be applied in a large-scale parameter optimization. Due to the limited availability of XRTS codes, in this work we present the ``\textbf{X}-ray \textbf{D}iagnostics, \textbf{A}nalysis, \textbf{V}erification and \textbf{E}xploration`` (\texttt{xDAVE}) code, designed to quickly estimate DSFs using the Chihara decomposition and analyse experimental spectra. The code is validated by re-analysing an experiment with isochorically heated beryllium at the OMEGA Laser Facility. In addition, we demonstrate the applicability of the code to plan experiments and predict scattering spectra through the coupling to a ray-tracing code. Lastly, the importance of accounting for the energy-dependence of spectrometer instrument functions is demonstrated by comparing ray-tracing simulations to the standard convolution for strongly compressed Beryllium shots at the National Ignition Facility similar to previously published results.
Submitted
29 April 2026yesterday
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.27237
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.