AG-2026.04-2072·physics.flu-dyn·cross-listed: physics.comp-ph
Training of particle-turbulence sub-grid-scale closures with just particle data
Authors
- G. Saltar Rivera
- L. Villafane
- J. B. Freund
Abstract
If sufficient training data are available, neural networks are attractive for representing missing physics in simulations, such as sub-grid scales in the coarse-mesh particle-turbulence system we consider. Physical constraints are known to both increase performance and reduce the need for data; we use the complete physics represented in the discretized governing equations as a constraint. Two-way coupled particles in two-dimensional turbulence provide a sufficiently complex system to assess effectiveness for various training data, all constructed from well-resolved simulations, in cases intentionally degraded to assess robustness. Surprisingly, using the full space-time data actually hinders model effectiveness. Instead, training that targets only spectra -- hence, neglecting phase information -- provides better closures, which is related to the well-known success of non-dissipative discretizations for simulating turbulence. It is found that some of the missing physics that lead to preferential particle concentration errors are fundamentally stochastic on the coarse mesh and therefore uncorrectable by the basic approach; a learning formulation is introduced for a Langevin-type closure to correct this. Most importantly, training just for particle kinetic energy -- without any direct input from the flow field -- also yields effective sub-grid-scale stress models. This holds true even if noise is added to the particle data, if only a sub-sample of particles are used, or if only one component of the particle velocity is used. In sum, these results show a path for inferring sub-grid-scale physics based just on particle data from experiments.
Submitted
29 April 20261 week ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.27255
Summary
Neural networks can learn to model missing physics in turbulence simulations using only particle data—specifically, just particle kinetic energy works surprisingly well, opening a path to infer turbulence effects directly from experimental particle measurements.
- Training on spectral information (energy at different scales) rather than raw space-time data produces better sub-grid-scale models, because it ignores misleading phase details and aligns with how turbulence naturally evolves.
- Remarkably, a neural network trained only on particle kinetic energy—without seeing the fluid flow itself—can still accurately predict the turbulence stresses that affect particle motion, even when data is noisy or sparse.
- Some errors in particle clustering patterns are inherently random at coarse resolution and cannot be fixed by traditional neural networks; the authors introduce a Langevin-type learner to handle this fundamental stochasticity.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.