AG-2026.04-2102·physics.optics
Generalized Optical Theorem for Structured Neutron Beams and Consequences for Forward-Transmission Null Tests of Time-Reversal Invariance
Authors
- Sepehr Samiei
Abstract
The simple form of the optical theorem of scattering theory, $σ_{\rm tot}^{\rm pw} = (4π/k)\,\Im f(0)$, is valid for an incident plane wave or for a wave packet whose Fourier components possess azimuthal symmetry about the incident wave vector $\vec{k}$. Previous work has shown that this expression can break down for structured beams of light which possess orbital angular momentum (OAM), despite the fact that there is clearly no violation of unitarity, and the relevant modifications have been worked out for the case of massless photons. We present a form of the optical theorem involving neutron OAM states for the case of the scattering of massive nonrelativistic particles. We apply this form to Ryndin's theorem on the application of time reversal symmetry to forward scattering, indicate how the statement of the null condition for T violation in forward scattering is modified, and show that this effect is negligible compared with other sources of systematic error in neutron optics transmission experiments.
Submitted
30 April 20262 weeks ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.27413
Summary
The optical theorem—a fundamental rule linking scattering angles to total scattering strength—needs modification for structured neutron beams carrying orbital angular momentum, though this correction is too small to affect real experiments testing time-reversal symmetry.
- The standard optical theorem breaks down for beams with orbital angular momentum (a twisting, corkscrew-like structure), not just for light but also for massive particles like neutrons.
- This requires rethinking how time-reversal symmetry tests work in forward-scattering experiments, since the null condition (where no signal means time reversal holds) depends on the beam structure.
- Despite these theoretical refinements, the effect is negligibly small compared to experimental noise, so existing neutron experiments remain valid without accounting for this correction.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.