AG-2026.04-507·hep-th·cross-listed: gr-qc
Black Hole Interiors as a Laboratory for Time-Dependent Classical Double Copy
Authors
- Damien A. Easson
- Tucker Manton
Abstract
The classical double copy provides a powerful bridge between gravity and gauge theory, but its most explicit realizations remain concentrated in stationary or highly symmetric settings. We show that trapped regions of black-hole geometries furnish an exact setting for time-dependent classical double copy. In the static, spherically symmetric case, each trapped interval admits a local single-copy description on the associated Kantowski--Sachs patch that is intrinsically time dependent, although it can be derived from static Kerr--Schild data and does not require knowledge of any exterior black-hole completion. We prove that this class is characterized intrinsically by a distinguished relation between the Kantowski--Sachs scale factors, equivalently by the longitudinal relation \(p_{\parallel}=-ρ\), and that the Kerr--Schild scalar and single-copy field are uniquely reconstructible from interior cosmological data. Schwarzschild provides the singular benchmark, for which the single-copy electric field diverges along the interior evolution, while the regular Bardeen solution yields a finite single-copy field throughout the trapped region and a smooth extension into a regular static core. The Bardeen core violates the strong energy condition in a compact region, whereas the corresponding single-copy Maxwell field remains regular and satisfies the standard classical energy conditions. We further show that the Bardeen horizon phase structure is encoded in the single-copy scalar. These results identify trapped Kerr--Schild interiors as an exact local laboratory for time-dependent classical double copy.
Submitted
21 April 20265 days ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.19920
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.