AG-2026.04-691·hep-th·cross-listed: math-phmath.AGmath.NT
Resurgence of high-energy string amplitudes
Authors
- Xavier Kervyn
- Stephan Stieberger
Abstract
We analyze the fixed-angle high-energy ($α' \to \infty$) structure of $n$-point tree-level string amplitudes from complementary perspectives: locally via saddle-point expansions, algebraically via difference equations and their asymptotic structure, analytically via Aomoto-Gauss-Manin connection and Mellin-Barnes representation, and geometrically via twisted intersection theory and Lefschetz thimbles. Using, in turn, saddle-point analysis and finite-difference equations in the kinematic variables, we show that the perturbative coefficients in the resulting asymptotic series in $1/α'$ are organized by Bernoulli-number data, rather than by the multiple zeta values characteristic of the low-energy $α' \to 0$ regime. Resurgence theory allows upgrading these divergent series to transseries whose Stokes data capture the analytic continuation between unphysical and physical kinematic regions in the form of non-perturbative monodromy contributions. We derive the transseries for four-point open string amplitudes explicitly. We also construct a differential and Mellin formulation which place their low- and high-energy expansions in a common analytic framework and unifies them as asymptotic sectors of the same underlying object. We extend the difference-equation analysis to $n \geq 5$, where it yields perturbative high-energy asymptotic expansions and leads naturally to a higher-rank connection problem. Finally, translating our asymptotic analysis into the language of twisted de Rham theory, we derive an alternative double-copy representation of the high-energy limit of closed-string amplitudes in terms of Lefschetz thimbles for any $n$.
Submitted
8 April 20262 weeks ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.07444
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.