AG-2026.04-786·hep-ph·cross-listed: hep-th
A Core Representation Theorem for Scheme-Invariant Collinear Factorization in QCD
Authors
- Dustin Keller
Abstract
Collinear factorization and the leading-twist operator product expansion (OPE) in perturbative QCD express suitably inclusive observables in scale-separated kinematics as composites of perturbative short-distance coefficients with universal long-distance non-perturbative correlators such as parton distribution functions (PDFs), up to controlled power corrections. A persistent structural feature is \emph{presentation non-uniqueness}: coefficients and correlators are not individually physical, but are defined only up to finite factorization-scheme redefinitions induced by collinear subtractions and renormalized-operator mixing. We formalize this redundancy categorically by introducing an \emph{interface algebra object} encoding admissible finite collinear counterterms/mixing kernels and by organizing coefficient data and hadronic data as right/left modules over this algebra in a symmetric monoidal category encoding the chosen recomposition calculus. Our main result, the \emph{Core Representation Theorem}, identifies the universal scheme-invariant carrier: the functor of balanced (scheme-invariant) pairings is represented by the relative tensor product $C\otimes_A f$, which is terminal among all quotients of the naive composite $C\otimes f$ that preserve scheme-invariant semantics. Finally, we show how standard physics inputs (symmetry constraints, locality/OPE, and a stated accuracy truncation) canonically induce the interface algebra and module structures, and we prove a minimal closure principle for completing a generating set of long-distance operators/correlators to an $A$-stable sector.
Submitted
15 April 20261 week ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.13439
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.