AG-2026.04-950·hep-ph·cross-listed: hep-thnucl-th
Heavy Quark Transport is Non-Gaussian Beyond Leading Log
Authors
- Jean F. Du Plessis
- Bruno Scheihing-Hitschfeld
Abstract
We find that heavy quark transport beyond leading logarithm at weak coupling is intrinsically non-Gaussian: the longitudinal momentum transfer distribution has asymmetric exponential tails that are crucial for equilibration dynamics. We show this by computing the leading-order momentum transfer kernel for relativistic heavy quarks in weakly coupled non-Abelian plasmas, matching perturbative momentum transfer on the thermal scale to hard-thermal-loop-resummed soft physics. This is the same structure previously found in strongly coupled holographic plasmas, showing that it is not peculiar to weak or strong coupling, conformality, or supersymmetry. We therefore expect that this is a robust feature that physical quark-gluon plasma should also exhibit.
Submitted
23 April 20263 days ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.21895
Summary
Heavy quarks moving through quark-gluon plasma experience non-Gaussian momentum kicks with asymmetric tails—a universal feature found in both weak and strong coupling regimes that matters for how the plasma reaches equilibrium.
- The momentum transfer distribution for heavy quarks has asymmetric exponential tails rather than the simpler bell-curve shape previously assumed, fundamentally changing how we model equilibration.
- This non-Gaussian behavior appears in both weakly coupled (perturbative) and strongly coupled (holographic) plasmas, suggesting it's a universal feature independent of the strength of interactions.
- The result bridges weak and strong coupling calculations by carefully matching short-distance hard physics to long-distance soft physics, providing confidence the effect should appear in real quark-gluon plasma experiments.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.