AG-2026.05-032·gr-qc
Singularity softening and avoidance by the action of thermal radiation in a generalized entropic cosmology
Authors
- E. Elizalde
- A. V. Yurov
- A. V. Timoshkin
Abstract
Some relevant aspects of a new form of generalized entropic cosmology, recently introduced by Nojiri, Odintsov and Faraoni, are considered. The setup is a logarithmic equation of state for a viscous dark fluid coupled with dark matter, in the ordinary Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker flat universe. The influence of thermal effects, caused by Hawking radiation, near the singularity, are carefully investigated. In particular, their role on the formation and specific type of the Big Rip expected to occur within a finite time. It is shown that a scenario arises, where a qualitative change towards the good direction, in the type of the singularity formed, does occur. On top of that, another very interesting scenario is obtained, where the singularity vanishes completely.
Submitted
4 May 20262 weeks ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2605.02477
Summary
Thermal radiation effects from black holes can soften or entirely eliminate catastrophic singularities in certain cosmological models where the universe is filled with a viscous dark fluid.
- Adding Hawking radiation to a generalized entropic cosmology model prevents the worst type of singularity (a Big Rip) and can shift it to a milder form, showing thermal effects regulate cosmic breakdown.
- Under specific conditions with a logarithmic equation of state, the singularity disappears entirely—meaning the universe avoids catastrophic collapse altogether in this modified framework.
- This work bridges quantum effects (Hawking radiation) and large-scale cosmology, suggesting that microscopic thermal processes might smooth out the universe's most violent predictions.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.