AG-2026.05-053·gr-qc
The Impact of Spin Priors on Parameterized Tests of General Relativity
Authors
- Tianhao Wu
- Shujun Rong
Abstract
Spin priors play a fundamental role in gravitational-wave parameter estimation, yet their impact on parameterized tests of General Relativity (GR) remains insufficiently understood. In this work, we systematically investigate how spin prior choices affect the 1.5PN deviation parameter $δ\hatφ_3$ using real gravitational-wave events. We quantify prior-induced effects through the Jensen--Shannon divergence (JSD) and median shifts of posterior distributions. We find that the effective precession spin parameter $χ_p$ exhibits significantly stronger prior sensitivity than the effective inspiral spin $χ_{\rm eff}$. While $δ\hatφ_3$ is generally robust across most events, GW231123\_135430 exhibits a noticeable discrepancy, with a JSD at the $\mathcal{O}(0.4)$ level. Examining the median shift, we note that events with very short inspiral durations, such as GW231028\_153006, GW231123\_135430, and GW191109\_010717, show more pronounced shifts, indicating increased sensitivity in low-information regimes. We further explore the relationship between the prior sensitivity of spin parameters and that of $δ\hatφ_3$. No significant correlation is observed when spin parameters are inferred within the standard GR framework. However, when $δ\hatφ_3$ is included in the analysis, a strong correlation emerges between $χ_{\rm eff}$ and $δ\hatφ_3$, which we attribute to partial parameter degeneracy at the 1.5PN order. A leave-one-out test shows that the observed correlation is sensitive to the inclusion of specific events, indicating that it is partially driven by a subset of high-sensitivity events. Our results demonstrate that spin-prior choices can propagate into parameterized tests of GR in a non-trivial and model-dependent manner, and may mimic or reshape apparent deviations from GR.
Submitted
6 May 20264 days ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2605.04579
Summary
When scientists search for deviations from Einstein's gravity in gravitational-wave signals, their choice of assumptions about black-hole spins can subtly change the results—sometimes creating fake signals of new physics or hiding real ones.
- Spin priors (initial assumptions about how fast black holes spin) affect measurements of potential GR violations differently depending on which spin measure you use: the precession spin is much more sensitive than the inspiral spin.
- Short, low-information gravitational-wave events show bigger prior-driven shifts in deviation measurements, meaning we're most vulnerable to this bias when signals are weakest.
- When testing for deviations from GR, spin parameters and GR-violation parameters become partially degenerate—the system can't cleanly separate them—creating strong correlations that may not reflect real physics.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.