AG-2026.05-068·gr-qc
Quasi-homogeneous black hole geometrothermodynamics in Einstein-Maxwell theory
Authors
- Hernando Quevedo
Abstract
In this review, we establish the mathematical framework of geometrothermodynamics (GTD) as a formalism capable of describing non-extensive, quasi-homogeneous, self-gravitating systems in a Legendre-invariant manner. We argue that the fundamental equations of black holes are quasi-homogeneous functions, a property that invalidates the standard Euler identity of laboratory thermodynamics. We derive the metrics for the equilibrium manifold and analyze their curvature singularities for the Reissner-Nordström, Kerr, and Kerr-Newman black holes. Furthermore, we establish a direct correspondence between the curvature singularities of the equilibrium space and phase transitions, as determined by the divergences of the corresponding heat capacities.
Submitted
7 May 20264 weeks ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2605.06602
Summary
This paper develops a mathematical framework showing that black hole thermodynamics requires modified rules (quasi-homogeneity) distinct from ordinary systems, and that singularities in the geometry of black hole states precisely predict where phase transitions occur.
- Black holes are 'quasi-homogeneous'—their fundamental thermodynamic equations don't follow the usual scaling laws of everyday matter, requiring a generalized mathematical framework called geometrothermodynamics.
- The geometry of possible black hole states (the 'equilibrium manifold') contains mathematical singularities that directly correspond to physical phase transitions where properties like heat capacity blow up.
- This framework unifies the description of three important black hole types—Reissner-Nordström (charged), Kerr (spinning), and Kerr-Newman (both)—under one consistent geometric theory.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.