AG-2026.05-088·hep-th·cross-listed: astro-ph.COgr-qc
Small Vacuum Energy and Tunneling in a Modified Bousso-Polchinski Model
Authors
- James Halverson
- Justin Khoury
- Cody Long
Abstract
We propose a simplified model for the cosmological constant in string theory flux vacua motivated by type IIB and F-theory compactifications. Relative to the Bousso-Polchinski model, small vacuum energy spacing occurs in thin wafers rather than thin shells. The model is applied to the entire Schöller-Skarke database of Calabi-Yau fourfolds, which exhibit $532,600,483$ distinct sets of Hodge numbers. The overwhelming majority of those ($99.95\%$ percent for some choices of parameters) exhibit a vacuum energy spacing of~$10^{-120}$ in Planck units or smaller. Brown-Teitelboim membrane nucleation transitions can populate this landscape of flux vacua. In the thin-wall approximation, and ignoring gravitational corrections, we find that the bubble transitions are always dominated by giant leaps in flux space. The age of the universe places a bound on Calabi-Yau topology that is satisfied for the entire Schöller-Skarke database.
Submitted
6 May 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2605.05357
Summary
Physicists model how string theory's cosmic vacuum energy could be extremely small, showing that most Calabi-Yau geometries naturally produce vacuum spacings around 10^-120 in Planck units, and that quantum tunneling between these states would involve giant jumps in string-theory fluxes.
- The modified model predicts that 99.95% of candidate geometries from the Schöller-Skarke database produce the kind of tiny vacuum-energy spacing needed to explain the observed cosmological constant—a seemingly rare value.
- Quantum transitions between different vacuum states jump dramatically through flux space rather than making incremental changes, suggesting the vacuum landscape has an unexpected structure.
- The entire database of possible string-theory geometries is consistent with our universe's age, meaning there's no topological fine-tuning problem in this framework.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.