AG-2026.05-104·astro-ph.GA
Self-consistent dynamical modelling of the Milky Way bar with orbital frequency analysis
Authors
- Zachary Langford
- Robyn Sanderson
- Madeline Lucey
- Jason A. S. Hunt
Abstract
We present an update to the frequency analysis method for measuring the properties of a galactic bar. The method involves computing the fundamental frequencies of orbits in rotating, N-body-derived potential models, classifying the stars as members of bar supporting orbits, and finding the extent of the apo-centre distribution. In this work, we apply an updated classification criterion designed to isolate the so-called "Warm" inner Lindblad resonance (ILR) orbits. These orbits have been shown to contain the looped x1 orbits, which dominate the "shoulder regions" of the bar and largely contribute to the radial extent. We apply this method to existing Gaia, APOGEE, and OGLE data of more than 200,000 stars to constrain the properties of the Milky Way bar. We find that multiple bar lengths and pattern speeds are consistent with the data to within 5 percent.
Submitted
12 May 20264 weeks ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2605.12424
Summary
Astronomers used orbital patterns in observational data to measure the Milky Way's bar structure, finding that several combinations of bar length and rotation speed fit the data equally well.
- The method identifies stars trapped in special 'looped' orbits that bulge out from the bar's sides, revealing where the bar actually ends.
- Analyzing over 200,000 stars from three major surveys (Gaia, APOGEE, OGLE) shows the bar's properties aren't uniquely determined by current data—multiple solutions work.
- This degeneracy matters because the bar's rotation speed affects models of how the Milky Way's spiral arms and dark matter interact with visible structures.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.